Tuesday, June 29, 2010

TIMING?? --THE PHANTOM MAN RETURNS



They all told me if was going to happen but I didn’t believe them. Three weeks after our “date”, Phantom Man actually had the nerve to email me.  Which I’m just going to add to the list of stupid s**t that men do. I don’t get it, didn’t you make it clear you weren’t interested when you disappeared for days? So, why would you reach out to me now?

The interesting thing is Phantom Man’s email was full of excuses, as if he believed I needed some explanation. Work had just gotten “crazy” for him and he tried to reach out to me multiple times but things “just got in the way”. And lastly the the one sentence that jumped from the screen,

“I just want you to know I did have a good time but it feels like the timing stars didn't align”.

Ahh… there it is . TIMING. Don’t you love that word? Men use this word as if it has real true meaning. It might mean something for them but in a woman’s mind, Timing is the moment you meet someone. We could be on our death bed, not expected to live and if a man with what we think is special walks through that door, life has brought us opportunity. We’re not looking for some “perfect time” to meet someone. Meeting someone is the perfect time.

The truth is, “timing” is just another way of saying, “ I just don’t like you” which in this case was made clear when the guy decided to disappear. So I am beyond confused why he decided to email me to just let me know again how much he wasn’t interested. Thank you Phantom Man, I think I really get it now.

Then I saw this VIDEO from Essence of their relationship editor Demetria Lucas on a blind date. It’s pretty much a short version of my dating experience. At the beginning it seems like they both had a good time. Demetria smiles as she retells the date. I know that look, that laugh. She was digging him and looking forward to learning more. But he didn’t call. He uses the fact that they didn’t spend more time with each other as a problem and then he adds the dreaded word “timing” to further explain why a 2nd date was not in order.

is Timing really an issue? Or is it just another way of saying I just didn’t like your ass? Can you meet someone that you really like but then the TIMING IS OFF??

As much as I don’t believe in this concept, I’ve seen timing work on the opposite end. I’ve seen multiple men make the decision that they were ready to be in a serious relationship and then they met the woman. At that point it was definitely all about timing. Had that woman showed up before they made the decoration to settle down she would have jut been another chick trying to lock him down. But he made the decision before meeting her and timing worked in everyone’s favor.

So, I bring it to you guys, Am I just jaded and mean? Could Phantom Man really be telling me the truth? How much is timing a real factor for men? And if so, what makes for “perfect” timing? If one can be bad, when is timing good? 

Friday, June 25, 2010

CELEBRATE LOVE PROFILE #3 OSSIE DAVIS AND RUBY DEE



There are many reasons to admire Ossie Davis and Ruby Dee. I’ve always been impressed by their dedication to their craft while simultaneously staying just as dedicated to marriage and family. Today we live in a world where family is often placed way far behind our careers. So many men (and a few women) believe once I got my career straight, then I’ll look for love.  Somewhere through the years we adopted the belief that having it all; a great career, multiple children, and a loving relationship wasn’t possible. But Ossie and Ruby Dee’s over 50 years of marriage and legendary careers dispel that belief 10th fold.

I found an EBONY article written in 1979 where the couple candidly talk about what makes their relationships work. At the time of the interview they had been married for 31 years. With their children now grown and out of the house, they were embarking on a new stage of their relationship, one they call best friends.

 But getting there was not easy.

Ruby is extremely candid about her resentment of gender roles and what she has lost by becoming a mother.

“There are things you must do to make things work- habits that you have to deal with… fitting in eating, sleeping, work, who does what, and those kind of things. But I was late coming into self-assurance and Ossie always seemed to have much more of that. I had to deal with resentments, to face up to them to not being able to do the things I wanted to do when I wanted to do them. I use to be very jealous of the fact that he could go away and be free of me and the children. To go off so easily and work at things he wanted to do. And I’m stuck with the babies and frustration, pounding on the walls”.

Can we say REAL?

It’s a shame that people don’t speak with that much honesty anymore. Regardless of being a celebrity or not, we no longer tell the truth. Especially women. When it comes to discussing the difficulties of becoming a mother and what that means for your career we all are somehow perfect at it. Ruby continues,

“When we were young, I was the sacrifice. Often when I’d turn down things (acting opportunities), it was because the children were there and I didn’t want to leave them. Ossie never said, ‘No Don’t go’. But he never said ‘Yes, go do that’. I wasn’t until much later that I felt the encouragement. I have to grow to the point of not so much needing his approval. I had to grow to the point where I could say ‘Well, Ossie, I’d like to do this and I’m going to do it’.

She speaks to the dilemma of being a woman, mother, and a wife. Two of those titles require an unrelenting selflessness while the other asks for independence and decisions of self-gratification. How does a woman, find the balance between all three? 



Through out the article they both talk freely about what marriage really means. Both seemed to enter the marriage never expecting “perfection” or life without troubles. They went into the union expecting to have to work at it. Marriage itself is hard, having children can be difficult but that wasn’t all they were dealing with. Add the dilemma of being African American actors in the height of the civil rights era. Today, people get divorced before they even truly start a marriage. Somehow with the world against them Ossie and Ruby made it through. What happen to the expectancy of work and commitment? When did marriage become so romantic that the moment an issue arises we are willing to go? I think all of us, black, white, male, female became so fiercely independent they we no longer see the gain in struggle. We no longer see the need of having someone around if we know we can do it all on our own.

Lastly, the couple talks about the importance of being friends with your partner.

“If we couldn’t have become friends, we would have run out of this relationship long ago Ossie says.

Today, we view relationships by what we as individuals will get out of them. What is he or she doing for me? How do I benefit? We all too quickly forget that if you truly love someone and respect them for all that they are, loving them has nothing to do with you. When you respect and form a relationship with a true understanding of what your partner needs and who they are, you’ve reached a level of friendship and compassion. And that clarity doesn’t arrive at the beginning of a love affair. You have to build it together. As Ossie says,

“You start out as lovers, then you’re husband and wife, then you’re parents, then co-workers, and ultimately you arrive at being friends”.


Ossie and Ruby got married in 1948. Somehow our approach to relationships has changed over the years. We no longer see relationships with the same understanding of commitment and union. Somehow we expect easy and romance before anything else. We watch TV shows like The Bachelor and The Bachelorette that set us up to believe that you can pick a partner out of a group of strangers and live happily ever after. And if dating becomes too “hard” we now have the option of sitting at home and pick profile pictures off the computer to distinguish who would be a worthy partner. In both examples finding love, finding a partner is all about “me”. If two people are looking for what works for them, who’s looking out for what works for us?

In a world so fixated on individual superiority, when and where do you find and build love?

For the longest, I kept a picture of Ossie and Rudy as a screensaver to remind myself that if I was willing to put in the hard work, then yes, I can have it all. I think it’s time to maybe put the picture up again. I need to be reminded that waiting for so-called “perfection” is like waiting to win the lottery. You have to build what you want in life, you can’t wait for someone to hand it to you.

Sometimes when you hold out for everything, the only thing that you get is nothing.

BUILD LOVE THIS WEEKEND PEOPLE!!

To read the article in it’s entirety CLICK HERE.


Thursday, June 24, 2010

WE'RE ALL SINGLE BECAUSE WE WANT TO



If you haven't ever read VERY SMART BROTHAS you need to. The majority of their posts are wild and always giving a perspective on dating that women usually don't want to hear. Most of the time, they keep me laughing but today's post they got me thinking.

As education deterred us from settling down? The more educated we are, the more opportunities we have, and the more opportunities we have, the farther we reach...so when it comes to dating, are we only looking for the best of the best?

In this post they argue that the problem for educated folks in metropolitan areas is that we don't know how to settle. We are looking for the best of the best in our careers and in our potential mates so when we run into "okay' we move on hoping for something better.

Interesting argument. I have to say I think they are more right with this then wrong. At what point to we learn to stop looking? And more importantly, is it time to look at our individual stock and realize...this is the best it's ever gonna get?

What are your thoughts?

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

DARK ROOMS AND POPCORN!!



I've been lucky enough to cover the Los Angeles Film Festival for Venus Zine Magazine. This is pretty much my first journalism endeavor since my days of wanting to be a reporter in high school. Before I got bit by the screenwriting bug. It's been a really great experience. The best part has been having a press pass! So many people WANT to talk to me for possible exposure and when there is a long line for a screening my beautiful yellow pass gets me "priority seating". Can't tell you the last time I felt so special!

Even though, I have been participating as "press", as a writer it's also been a really great experience. For years, I have avoided attending film festivals. I just got soo tired of all the thirsty people. Most filmmakers, writers, directors that are there are so hungry for their careers to take off they are so aggressively looking for the person to change their life. No one is really interested in who you are. They just  want to know what you do and what you can do for them. This is why I hate "Networking Events". Working as a directors assistant was when I experienced some of the worst times at a film festival. People throwing cards, constant emails, scripts at me all for a chance. And the Director I worked for wasn't that interested in helping someone else than he was in pushing his career forward. The problem is most people at film festivals are more interested in seeing what someone can do for them instead of learning their craft. I am a firm believer if you do a great job, then chance and opportunity come to you. When your work is great, you don't have to shove it down peoples throats. One of my favorite Prince songs, "Baby I'm A Star" says it oh so perfectly:

Nothing come to easy, but when you got it baby, nothing come to hard 


This experience at a film festival was different because I just focused on celebrating film making. It's funny because as many people who move to Los Angeles to work in the business, I don't know that many that actually love films. Most people are chasing fame and validation then really understanding and loving the art of story. The following films have been ones that I have enjoyed and are worth seeing at the Film Festival this week.

The New Year - A very simplistic coming of age story of Sunny, a college drop out who moved back home to Pensacola, Fl to take of her cancer ridden father. Two years later, her life is still on pause. She's stuck between doing what's good for her and doing what's safe.

Everyday Sunshine, The Story of Fishbone -- The title says it all. As teenager in the 90's, I remember Fishbone but had NO IDEA that their story was so dramatic and interesting. The documentary itself is good but its the band members candid interviews that make it soo great. If you are not a fan when you see the film, you'll definitely be one when you leave.

Cyrus - I saw this film without knowing really anything about the whole "mumblecore" phenom. I had been waiting to see this film because of the fact that the filmmakers (Duplass brothers) found a way to spin a romantic comedy. Any romantic comedy writer is in constant pursuit of how to tell the same love story differently. Well, the Duplass brothers do and succeed.

Tonight I see Waiting For Superman, the documentary about our failing school system made by Davis Guggenheim, the Oscar winning director of an Inconvenient Truth. Followed by a pool side discussion about how to possibly save public education.

Later this week I see:

 Revolucion - the culmination of 10 short films by the most prominent Mexican directors. All have a perspective of Mexico's growth since the Mexican Revolution.

Welcome To The Rileys - The Jake Scott directed tale of rebirth and reinvention in New Orleans. Starring James Gandolfini, Melissa Leo and Kristen Stewart.

Animal Kingdom - The Australian gangster movie that was a Sundance favorite.

The King of Pastry - Anyone who watches the Food Network knows that making Pastries can deal with a lot of drama. This french documentary follows 16 chefs over 3 days as they compete for the Meilleurs Ouvriers de France - one of the highest accolade for a Pastry Chef.

All reviews of these films will be on www.venuszine.com as the week continues.

Off to the movies!

Friday, June 18, 2010

DO YOU LOVE ME??


Alright folks, I need your help. If you like what I am doing here please please let me and let others know. It can get a lil lonely out here in cyberspace and once in awhile I need to know I'm not out here all alone. 


Most importantly, I would love to expand my readership, especially with Celebrate Love Fridays. So if you read something you like, please pass it on to others. 


Love you much! 


Aireka 

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

SEX, ARE YOU HAVING IT?



I love Sex And The City. Might of hated SATC2 but the series will always stand as gold for me. Last night, still high from the Laker game (GAME 7 BABY) I watched “The Drought” from season one. The episode goes on to deal with all four women having issues because they weren't having sex. Charlotte is dating yet another waspy man that she believes in the one. This time it’s because they are not having sex. She tells Carrie, excited and blissful, that they are able to be intimate and cuddle without the pressure. She feels safe… until she learns he use to be a sex maniac. Now Charlotte’s in a mad rush to have sex with him. Immediately her sexuality is challenged. “Could he possibly not find me sexy”? Being on Prozac, the guy is just not interested in sex the way he used to and is actually happy with his newfound clarity. But now Charlotte, who loved the fact they weren’t having sex is uncomfortable in a relationship without it. He asks her,

“Come on, wouldn’t you rather be with a guy that is kind and giving, not so interested in sex, rather then an unstable bull over sexed guy that is only interested in one thing”?

And there you have it. When most women are looking for the guy that is interested in them beyond what they can do in bed, Charlotte without any hesitation answers “no”.

This is where I must stand as an ambassador for my gender and apologize to all men out there. I’m sorry for all the tug and pull you guys have to go through. The truth is we women really don’t know what we want. In the beginning, we work hard at looking sexy, wear tight jeans, and work for the perfect cleavage. As much as we throw the possibility of getting busy, the guy can’t be too eager about it. The moment he can’t keep his hands off of us, he’s rude and has no boundaries. But he can’t not want it either. As soon as a man doesn’t show any interest are egos are bruised and are femininity and self worth are in question. But the tug and pull doesn’t just stop once were locked down. The unbalance of sex in a relationship can easily cause a crack in the foundation that is close to impossible to fix. As soon as one person wants it and the other doesn’t, the amount of commitment and love is hit with a big question mark.  

And there's the dichotomy: sex is not important until the moment it's not. 

I wonder if we have screwed up the dynamic of love and attraction by putting so much emphasis on sex. We get into relationships to have it; we get into relationships to not have it. But really how important is it? Compatibility of two people is often measured by how good it is when they’re together. We know that two people can have crazy sexual energy but be terrible as a couple but how come we don’t believe two people can be great as a couple but not good in bed?  Then the level of intimacy of a relationship is measured by how often a couple has sex. But how can you measure intimacy and compatibility when our individual needs change from person to person? On average, couples have sex 8 to 12 times a month. The crazy thing is I don’t think most people know that.  There are plenty of women questioning how much their man is into them because they only have sex two of three times a week. If people are having sex less then we realize, how did we get to expect so much more?

Earlier this year, Elle published an article questioning,Does a couple have to be hot and heavy to be happy? According to the article, low and no sex couples are not rare. 14% of married couples have experience little to no sex in the past year. The article features 2 women in happy stable relationships who were no longer interested in having sex. They have sex close to three times a year.  After talking about how happy she was, one of the women ended up cheating on her boyfriend!  It was the fact that she felt sexually connected to another man when she realized the “sexless ness” was just another sign that she was in the wrong relationship. As this woman’s story is an example, there are obvious and true reasons why happiness is connected to ones sex drive. It allows us to feel wanted, loved, important, and connected. Studies show that people who deal with “involuntary celibacy” often deal with depression, rejection, and low esteem. But how much of the sex = happiness correlation is too much?

 Is it fair to gauge intimacy and compatibility to how much sex a couple has? Can two people not have sex for a period of time and be happy? If you have sex and its bad, does that mean there is no possibility of compatibility?

Let’s discuss…

Monday, June 14, 2010

GIRLFRIENDS VS BOYFRIENDS. WHO WINS?





I had a great weekend full of alcohol, sunshine and good friends; the beginning of a great summer in L.A. This weekend especially I felt the importance of good girlfriends. I am blessed and fortune to have built strong friendships with amazing women. It blows my mind when I come across other fantastic women who voice that they have had problems with female friendships. My girlfriends are essential to my sanity and I don’t know how people live without them.

But, how come we have the tendency to abandon these relationships as soon as we start dating someone serious? It’s something about women that I never understood. I have been guilty of committing this crime but honestly, it was only in the relationships that I had no business being in. I didn’t want to admit how I was with the wrong guy and the best sure way of doing that is to not spend time with my girls so I didn’t have to tell the truth. The relationships where I felt the freedom to be who I am, I wanted to see my girlfriends. I looked forward to spending exclusive evenings with them. There was less of a need to be with my man all the time and more of a want to independently continue the important relationships that contributed to the person that I was. Why is this the first thing we lose when we fall in love? Of course, I am not in a serious relationship right now so I can logically comment on this phenomenon. Sadly, I see it become more of a problem as we get older. We spend less time going out as groups. We get boggled down with our careers, daily rituals, that all of our free time immediately goes to the new man in our life. There is a huge part of my brain that understands this rationally but how come we easily can abandon the women in our lives that have been there for years to a person that we have only known for such a short time?

The obvious answers are sex and intimacy. These two things we all are searching for regardless if we want to admit it or not. We all want it but there’s got to be a way to balance both our love relationships and our friendships at the same time. Sure, it’s not easy but I believe our friendships are important enough to put in the hard work. We are so easily willing to put in the extra work in our love relationships why can’t easily do that with our friendships?

I love and need my girlfriends. There is a subtle understanding that women give that no matter how close I am to my man I can never get from him. The odd thing is that men don’t seem to have this issue. Regardless of their relationship status, making time for their boys seems effortless. But again, I’m a woman so maybe that’s just an assumption and men have issues maintaining their friendships also. I have been also lucky enough to have die hard friendships with men and but also noticed that as soon as they are serious with a girlfriend, our friendship shifts. But in some odd way, regardless of my own disappointment, I can understand it more than when I lose my girlfriends under the same circumstance.

Maybe that’s the key; understanding the change in the friendship as a shift, not a loss. Maybe it’s just the pure understanding that friendships ebb and flow especially when one finds love. Possibly, true friendships are the ones that maintain themselves regardless of time and effort.

 I guess today’s post is really just a big huge ramble of thoughts. I don’t have answers or a real clear stance… just an observation.

Ladies, why do we have an issue maintaining our friendships when we hit coupledom? And men… is this just a female issue or do men also disappear when they get a lady?

Happy Monday People! Let’s discuss…